The shipping industry is under unprecedented pressure to decarbonise. With the IMO’s 2030 and 2050 targets approaching, vessel owners face hard choices about which fuels and technologies to adopt. While alternative fuels offer opportunities, each pathway carries unique costs, risks, and operational implications.
The Regulatory Backdrop
The IMO’s 2023 strategy sets a target of reducing total annual greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping by at least 20 percent by 2030 and striving for 70 percent by 2050 compared to 2008 levels. Regional regulations, such as the EU’s Emissions Trading System (ETS) inclusion of shipping and FuelEU Maritime, further tighten requirements. This regulatory momentum makes fuel transition an unavoidable strategic priority.
LNG: The Transitional Fuel
Liquefied natural gas (LNG) has become the most widely adopted alternative fuel to date, with more than 1,000 LNG-capable vessels in operation globally. LNG reduces CO₂ emissions by about 20 percent compared to heavy fuel oil and virtually eliminates SOx emissions. However, methane slip remains a major challenge, and new regulations may reduce LNG’s role over the long term. Owners adopting LNG must also consider bunkering infrastructure, which is concentrated in Europe and Asia but still limited elsewhere.
Methanol: The Rising Contender
Methanol has gained rapid traction, with major liner operators placing orders for dual-fuel methanol vessels. It offers simpler handling compared to LNG and can be produced from renewable sources, making it a potential carbon-neutral option. However, methanol’s lower energy density means higher fuel volumes are required, and the supply of green methanol remains limited. Port readiness is growing, but uneven across regions.
Ammonia: The Long-Term Option
Ammonia is being positioned as a zero-carbon fuel if produced from renewable sources. It is attractive because it contains no carbon and can leverage existing global ammonia production infrastructure. However, toxicity and safety concerns present major operational hurdles, and engine technology is still in the pilot phase. Large-scale adoption is unlikely before 2030, but planning has already begun.
Hydrogen: The Ambitious Vision
Hydrogen is the most talked-about but least mature option for deep-sea shipping. While it offers zero carbon emissions at point of use, storage challenges, energy density issues, and the lack of global bunkering infrastructure make it impractical for most vessels today. It may find niche use in short-sea shipping and specialised vessels over the next decade.
How MS&C Supports Clients
Marine Services & Consultant (HK) Ltd monitors global fuel adoption trends, port readiness, and technology developments to help owners plan long-term investments. We advise on the comparative costs and risks of different fuel pathways, provide intelligence on retrofitting opportunities, and support compliance strategies aligned with IMO and regional targets. By combining technical insight with practical planning, MS&C enables clients to prepare for decarbonisation without compromising operational or commercial priorities.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.